"Conversion of Russia" Update:
Putins Soviet-Style Justice
System
by Christopher A. Ferrara
Once again the
New York Times tells us the truth about conditions in the "miraculously
transformed" nation of Russia an irony of ironies, given the
Times sordid past as an apologist for Joseph Stalin.
Today the
Times provides the Russian news you will not hear about from the
neo-Catholic establishment, which marches in lock step with Cardinal
Sodanos party line that the prophecies of the Message of Fatima "belong
to the past."
On September 8,
2003 the Times reported that Vladimir ("the practicing Christian") Putin
has been aiming his so-called crime efforts at wouldnt you know
it? his "old political enemies," whom he has been prosecuting on various
trumped up charges. The Times notes that "Such prosecutions only move
the nation backward to the day when Russias powerful routinely chose who
paid a price for breaking the law."
Even the
"Practicing Christians" lauded introduction of jury trials is a sham. It
was only this summer that the city of Moscow had its first trial by jury. In
any case, Russias higher courts routinely undo jury verdicts. Indeed,
Russias Supreme Court "repeatedly rejects acquittals by lower courts,
sometimes as many as three times for the same defendant." There is no principle
of double jeopardy in the Russian legal system. A defendant can be tried,
retried, and tried yet again until the Russian Supreme Court gets the result it
wants.
In other words, the
jury trials that are afforded are only show trials. The real "trial" is before
the Russian Supreme Court, which convicts whomever it likes regardless of the
evidence. As the Times notes: "As in the old Soviet days, the Supreme
Court continues to meddle in the lower courts, advising judges in advance
instead of waiting for cases to arrive on appeal. Such top down justice robs
the Russian populace of a decent judicial system, with independent judges, real
juries and a presumption of innocence."
No religious
conversion. No economic conversion. No civil liberties conversion, in terms of
freedom of press. And no judicial conversion, but rather mock trials, just like
in the days of Joe Stalin.
Where, then, is the
"conversion of Russia" hailed by Father Fox and the rest of his fellow
neo-Catholic dupes since the non-consecration of Russia in 1984? The conversion
of Russia exists, if anywhere, only in their minds. Meanwhile, the real people
living in the real Russia must suffer the consequences of Cardinal
Sodanos party line on Fatima. Who would want to be judged by God for a
debacle of such proportions?
Previous Articles
|