|
 |
“Fruits of Ostpolitik” Update
What Did the Visit to the Ukraine
Accomplish?
by Christopher A. Ferrara
The Pope's visit to the Ukraine is over. The long-awaited visit certainly
heartened Ukrainian Catholics, and the Pope was courageous in his beatification
of Ukrainian martyrs all victims of communismwhich he actually mentioned
by name. One can hope that, at long last, the facade of Ostpolitik is
showing a crack or two. We shall see.
As for the
Orthodox, an interesting development has arisen. The Moscow-controlled
Ukrainian Orthodox Church orchestrated opposition to the papal visit, including
accusations from Russian Orthodox patriarch Alexy II that Rome is "'buying' the
faith of Ukrainians . . . 'proselytizing,' and 'violating' the Orthodox
'canonical territory' to which Ukraine belongs." (Zenit, June 26, 2001)
Demonstrators called the Pope "Precursor of the Antichrist."
But the tide may be turning against Alexy and Moscow. As Zenit
notes "[t]he Ukrainian Orthodox Church has been split by at least two schisms.
Metropolitan Archbishop Filaret of Kiev, who wanted to be appointed patriarch
of the Russian capital, rebelled when the Holy Synod elected Alexy II. When
Ukraine became independent, he proclaimed himself patriarch of Kiev. Irked,
Moscow's patriarch responded by excommunicating Filaret and reducing him to the
lay state. The Orthodox who were persecuted under Communism also rebelled
against Alexy II's appointment, believing him to be a former KGB agent in
Estonia. Their disaffection resulted in the creation of the Ukrainian
Autocephalous Orthodox Church, considered schismatic by Moscow."
So now there are
two new branches of Orthodox in the Ukraine which are allied against Moscow.
And the adherents of these new branches are much more inclined toward Rome than
Alexy, even if they remain schismatic. Patriarch Filaret, "a Soviet-era enemy
of the Greek-Catholics," once refused to shake hands with the great Ukrainian
prelate, Cardinal Myroslav Ivan Lubachivski. But during the Pope's visit he
kissed the Pope and called him "the apostle of unity among Churches." And
Metropolitan Methodius of the Autocephalous Church said that "unity is possible
between Orthodox and Catholics."
What all this
means is far from clear. Schismatics are still schismatics. But the two new
branches of Ukrainian Orthodoxy are not (to all appearances) Moscow-controlled
schismatics any longer. They appear to have had their fill of Alexy and his
Kremlin bosses. Only time will tell if this is a step toward Orthodox
reunification with Rome, or just another schism among schisms.
Previous Articles
|
|
Printer friendly
|
|