|
 |
Timid Words from Timid
Churchmen
by Christopher A. Ferrara
On May 15, 2002
Zenit.org reported an address by Archbishop Jean Louis Tauran, who is Vatican
Secretary for Relations with States - that is, an attaché of Cardinal
Sodanos Secretariat of State.
Taurans
speech is yet another example of why the Church is in crisis: post-conciliar
Churchmen have forgotten how to speak with the fearless voice of the Church of
old, and are now reduced to timidly diplomatic statements that barely hint at
what the Church teaches.
Taurans topic
was the Churchs role in the European Union. According to Zenit,
Tauran said that "The Church feels at home in Europe, " and "hopes
that its European citizenship will be recognized." Pretty fearless,
eh? Tauran noted, rightly enough, that the Church "has molded the great
institutions on which the Old World is founded because, as Paul VI said, Europe
was born from the cross, the book, and the plough," but then landed with a thud
when he added that "the Christian legacy is always active and a creator of
culture."
Here we go again:
in the new way of putting things, the rights of the Church should be recognized
because the Church is just so darned useful to society. Why just look at
all the culture Christianity (we never say Catholicism anymore) has
produced. The Italian Vice-Prime Minister, Gianfranco Fini, responded in the
same vein, graciously conceding that yes, the Continent needs "a supplement of
soul." Accordingly, the EU Charter of Fundamental rights should make a
reference not merely to "spiritual values," says Fini, but rather to the
"concretely religious and Christian."
No, not Christian,
but Catholic. And not a mere "supplement" to the soul of Europe, but the
very soul itself. For as Hillaire Belloc rightly observed: "Europe is the faith
and the faith is Europe."
In his great
encylical Quas Primas (On the Social Kingship of Christ), Pope Pius XI,
writing in 1925 - only 37 years before Vatican II - spoke as the Church has
always spoken. Compare this Popes noble and uncompromising teaching with
the palaver coming out of the Vatican these days. Quoting his predecessor Leo
XIII, Pius XI declared that:
His [Christs] empire includes not only
Catholic nations, not only baptized persons who, though of right belonging to
the Church, have been led astray by error, or have been cut off from her by
schism, but also all those who are outside the Christian faith; so that truly
the whole of mankind is subject to the power of Jesus Christ. Nor is
there any difference in this matter between the individual and the family or
the State; for all men, whether collectively or individually, are under the
dominion of Christ. In Him is the salvation of the individual, in Him is
the salvation of society
.
The problem in the
"modern world," however, is that that it has rejected the Social Kingship of
Christ, and thus the authority of His Church. Here Pope Pius XI did not mince
words in the manner of modern Vatican diplomats:
The empire of Christ over all nations was rejected.
The right which the Church has from Christ Himself, to teach mankind, to
make laws, to govern peoples in all that pertains to their eternal
salvation, that right was denied. Then gradually the religion of Christ came to
be likened to false religions and to be placed ignominiously on the same level
with them.
As a result, warned
Pope Pius XI, "human society is tottering to its fall, because it has no
longer a secure and solid foundation."
So, the Catholic
Church is a bit more than an institution that feels "at home" in Europe and
"creates culture." And she is much more than a "supplement to the soul" of
Europe. As Hillaire Belloc put it: "Europe is the Faith, and the Faith is
Europe." And without the Faith, without Christ the King, both Europe and the
world are lost.
At least that is
how Catholics spoke before the "renewal" of Vatican II turned the
representatives of Christ the King into timid pleaders for a place in the
public square.
Previous Articles
|
|
Printer friendly
|
|