"Springtime of Vatican
II" Update
Ratzingers Weak
Tea
by Christopher A. Ferrara
As apostate Europe
is literally dying before his eyes, the ever-ambiguous Cardinal Joseph
Ratzinger, whose motto seems to be "Never say anything explicitly Catholic",
offers this laughably weak prescription for Europes fatal condition: a
"common morality" with non-believers.
According to
Zenit.org (December 14, 2004) "Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger and the president of
the Italian Senate agree that there must be collaboration among Catholics,
nonbelievers and believers of other religions to rediscover a common
morality." What can Ratzinger possibly mean by a "common morality" with
those who do not even believe in God and who reject the Catholic Churchs
most basic moral teachings?
Zenit reports that
"The Cardinal proposed the rediscovery of natural law as the basis for a common
ethic." And how does one "rediscover" natural law with those who do not believe
in God, Who is the very source of natural law? As St. Thomas teaches, the
natural law is mans intellectual participation in the eternal law. The
eternal law is Gods plan for man, and the natural law, including the Ten
Commandments, is mans conformity with this plan.
If there were no
eternal law that is, if there were no God then there could be no
natural law. Dostoyevskys Ivan Karamazov rightly argues that without God
"everything would be lawful, even cannibalism" and "if you were to destroy
faith in immortality, not only love but every living force maintaining life in
the world would at once be dried up
. "
Ignoring this
obvious problem of finding a "common morality" with people who do not even
believe in the very basis of morality Almighty God Ratzinger
opined that "We must study natural law again perhaps another name is
needed," said Ratzinger.
So now the Cardinal
thinks we perhaps ought to rename the natural law? Here we have yet
another example of the tendency of post-conciliar Churchmen to reject
traditional terminology in favor of ambiguous new expressions which only hide
the reality of what is under discussion.
And here what is
under discussion are laws governing human behavior which, as St. Paul
teaches us, are written on mans heart by his Creator. And what spiffy new
name would the Cardinal give the natural law? "natural recommendations,"
perhaps? Or how about "natural proposals"? There are a great many proposals and
recommendations in post-conciliar documents, but precious little reference, if
any, to Gods law. We live in a time when the very word "law" makes
many Churchmen squirm with embarrassment.
Ratzinger went on
to say that "it is necessary to identify the foundations to individualize
common responsibilities between Catholics and secularists, to base an action
which not only responds to the action, but also to duty and morality."
Yet more
gobbledygook. What are these "foundations" we are supposed to "identify" if not
simply mans nature as a creature of God, Who has written His Law on
mans heart? What are we supposed to do in this "collaboration among
Catholics, nonbelievers and believers of other religions to rediscover a
common morality"? Are we supposed to pretend that there are "foundations"
to the natural law other than what we know to be the only true foundation?
So, Europe is dying
as Dr. Ratzinger offers the dying patient a cup of weak tea. Meanwhile, the
Cardinal fails to mention the one medicine that can work a cure: the Gospel of
Jesus Christ, enunciated by the only Church to which God Incarnate gave a
divine commission to make disciples of all nations.
But making
disciples of all nations seems to be the farthest thing from the minds of those
who control the Vatican bureaucracy today. Such is the crisis in post-conciliar
Roman Catholicism a crisis Our Lady of Fatima came to address, confiding
to us the very words by which, sooner or later, the crisis will be ended: "In
the end, My Immaculate Heart will triumph. The Holy Father will consecrate
Russia to Me, and she will be converted, and a period of peace will be granted
to the world."
Previous Articles
|